Follow India Renewable Energy News on WhatsApp for exclusive updates on clean energy news and insights

APTEL Ruling on Depreciation Recovery for Power Plants

In a landmark decision, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) has clarified the rules surrounding depreciation recovery for power plants, emphasizing that regulatory commissions cannot arbitrarily shorten the depreciation period if a power plant's useful life has been established. This ruling is particularly significant for power developers, as it ensures fair cost recovery over the full useful life of their assets.

Case Background

The case centers around Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. (TPDDL), which commissioned a 94.8 MW combined cycle power plant in Rithala in 2011, with a regulatory approval for a useful life of 15 years. TPDDL sought to recover depreciation costs over this full period, as outlined in a 2017 regulatory order. However, in a subsequent 2019 true-up order, the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) restricted the depreciation recovery to just 6 years, linking it to the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) period, which was also approved for 6 years. This decision effectively stranded Rs94.59 crore of costs, as TPDDL was only allowed to recover Rs83.34 crore.

In response, TPDDL challenged DERC's ruling before APTEL, arguing that the commission's decision was inconsistent with the established useful life of the plant.

APTEL’s Ruling and Rationale

Upon reviewing the principles of depreciation, APTEL reaffirmed that depreciation reflects the decrease in an asset's value over its useful life. The tribunal highlighted three standard methods for calculating depreciation:

1. Straight Line Method: Equal depreciation over the asset’s useful life.
2. Written Down Value Method: Higher depreciation in the initial years, decreasing over time.
3. Units of Production Method: Based on actual usage or production.

APTEL found that, according to DERC regulations, depreciation must be calculated annually using the straight-line method over the asset's useful life. Since DERC had already recognized the plant's useful life as 15 years in its 2017 order, APTEL ruled that the depreciation recovery must also adhere to this timeframe. Consequently, APTEL set aside DERC's order and directed it to allow full depreciation recovery over the 15-year period.

Importance of the Ruling

This ruling is crucial for several reasons. First, it ensures that cost recovery mechanisms for power plants are consistent with previously approved useful life determinations. This consistency is vital for maintaining investor confidence in the power sector, as arbitrary changes to depreciation periods could deter investment and disrupt financial planning for power developers.

The decision also raises important questions about the relationship between depreciation recovery and the PPA period. APTEL's ruling suggests that depreciation should be linked to the plant's useful life rather than the PPA duration, reinforcing the principle that regulatory frameworks should support long-term investment stability.

In conclusion, APTEL's ruling serves as a significant precedent in the energy sector, reinforcing the importance of adhering to established asset lifespans for depreciation recovery. This decision not only protects the interests of power developers but also contributes to a more stable regulatory environment that can foster investment in the energy sector.